STEMGRABOpen the tool →
Plain-language guide

Stems, samples and the law: what's actually allowed?

Full-quality stems. No account, no per-track fee.Same model and same 192 kbps (or lossless WAV) as the paid tier — tracks up to 15 minutes.

You've split a song into stems. Can you practise with them? Remix them? Put the result on Spotify? Here's the honest lay-of-the-land, in plain language.

Honesty first: we build audio tools; we are not lawyers, and this is not legal advice. Copyright law differs by country and the details matter. For anything commercial or high-stakes, talk to a music-rights professional. What follows is the general picture most musicians work with.

The one thing to understand: every song is two copyrights

Nearly all confusion about stems and samples dissolves once you know that a released song carries two separate rights:

These can belong to completely different people. When you extract stems from a record, you're handling the recording, and everything you may or may not do downstream depends on which of the two rights your plan touches.

Private use: the safe zone

Practising along with stems, transcribing a bassline, studying how a vocal was produced, experimenting in your DAW for your own ears: this is what stem tools are for, and it's broadly the safe zone. Many jurisdictions explicitly carve out room for private, non-distributed use (private-copy provisions in much of Europe; fair-use factors in the US lean heavily toward private study). The pattern across all of copyright law is consistent: the trouble starts at publication, not at practice. Nobody is coming for your bedroom rehearsal with a drumless practice track.

Covers: composition only, and largely a solved problem

A cover is you performing the song yourself, from scratch. You're using the composition but not the original recording, so you only need the composition side cleared, and this is the most streamlined corner of music licensing. In the US there's a compulsory mechanical licence (the writer cannot refuse you); distributors and services handle it almost automatically, and YouTube's blanket publisher deals cover most covers uploaded there (revenue is typically shared with the publisher).

The catch for stem users: a cover licence covers your new recording. It does not let you fly the original's extracted backing track or vocal under your version: the moment original recording audio is in your release, you've left cover territory.

Remixes and sampling: both rights, permission required

A remix built on extracted stems, or a track that samples a piece of a recording, uses the master itself, so publishing it needs clearance from both sides: the recording owner and the publisher. A few honest realities:

Quick reference

What you doRights involvedRealistic status
Practise / study with stems privatelyNoneSafe zone
Publish a cover (your own recording)CompositionEasy, largely automated licensing
Karaoke night with an extracted instrumentalRecording + compositionVenues carry blanket licences; private parties are private
Publish a remix using extracted stemsRecording + compositionNeeds permission from both; unofficial = tolerated at best
Sample a stem in a commercial releaseRecording + compositionClear it first: no seconds-rule shortcut exists

Where to actually arrange licences

Rule of thumb: if it stays on your hard drive or in your practice room, relax and make music. The moment you hit "publish" with someone else's recording inside your audio, get permission, or replay the part yourself.

Ready to study a track up close? Split it into stems, free, no account, files auto-deleted.

Open the stem splitter →

More from StemGrab: how stem separation works · practise any instrument with stems